top of page

Episode 22 – Risk Culture and Decision-Making: Leadership Lessons for Chief Risk Officers and Boards with Leroy Roberts

  • Writer: Julien Haye
    Julien Haye
  • 4 days ago
  • 5 min read
RiskMasters podcast Episode 22 featuring Leroy Roberts on risk culture and decision-making for chief risk officers and boards


In this episode of RiskMasters, I speak with Leroy Roberts, founder of Team-Worth Solutions and a leadership and risk advisor specialising in risk culture, conduct risk, and decision-making in high-pressure environments.


With more than 19 years of frontline leadership experience across the British Army, the Jamaica Constabulary Force, and board-level advisory roles, Leroy brings a practical perspective on how risk management frameworks, leadership behaviour, and culture interact to shape outcomes.


This conversation focuses on a critical but often overlooked reality:risk culture is not a values exercise. It is a control mechanism that directly influences risk decision-making and operational risk outcomes.


🎯 What You Will Learn


  • How risk culture influences decision-making at every level of the organisation

  • Why operational risk often builds through behavioural drift, not isolated events

  • How chief risk officers and board directors can identify early warning signals

  • Why silence and hesitation are indicators of weakening risk control

  • How “decision drag” impacts risk management effectiveness and execution

  • Practical ways to strengthen leadership accountability and governance discipline


⏱️ Episode Highlights


02:30 – Risk decision-making under pressure and leadership accountabilityHow leaders behave when decisions carry consequence, and why accountability often weakens under stress.

06:45 – The role of risk culture in operational risk outcomesWhy culture acts as a control mechanism shaping how risks are identified, escalated, and managed.

12:10 – Early warning signals in risk management systemsHow behavioural drift, hesitation, and delayed escalation signal weakening control before incidents emerge.

21:30 – How boards can improve oversight of risk culture and conduct riskWhat boards should actually look for, moving from narrative to evidence-based oversight.

30:15 – Strengthening governance through clear ownership and escalation disciplineWhy clarity of ownership and decision rights is the most direct lever to restore control and execution pace.


🧠 Key Insight


“Risk culture determines whether issues are surfaced early or allowed to accumulate. It is a control mechanism embedded in how decisions are made.”


🎧 Listen now on:


• Other platforms available


👤 About Leroy Roberts


Leroy Roberts is the founder of Team-Worth Solutions, specialising in risk culture, leadership, and conduct risk. He advises organisations on strengthening risk management, decision-making, and governance frameworks, helping leaders identify and act on early signals before risks escalate into incidents.



Learn more about the Culture and conduct scorecard mentioned during the episode: https://forms.gle/xf2RmgTsYGP57KJf7

 

 

📝 Related Resources


 

🎓 Download your CPD certificate:

 

 

🧭 RECAP BLOG


Culture Is Already Controlling Your Risk Outcomes


“Most organisations discover culture risk too late. The signals were there, but they were not seen or acted upon.”


Culture as a Control Mechanism


Culture is often positioned as engagement, values, or communication. This framing limits its role to something supportive rather than something structural.


In practice, culture determines how decisions are made, how issues are escalated, and how people behave under pressure. It operates continuously, shaping outcomes long before formal controls are activated.


When understood as a control mechanism, culture becomes part of the governance system itself. It influences whether risks are surfaced early, whether decisions are taken with clarity, and whether accountability is exercised in real time.


Risk Builds Through Behaviour, Not Events


Most culture and conduct failures do not begin with a visible incident. They emerge through small behavioural shifts that accumulate over time.


Decisions take longer than expected. Ownership becomes less precise. Teams begin to operate with implicit assumptions rather than explicit clarity. Individuals hesitate before raising concerns.


These are not isolated observations. They are early signals of weakening control.

By the time a formal issue is recognised, the underlying conditions have often been in place for some time.


Silence as a Structural Signal


Silence is often interpreted as alignment. In reality, it reflects a decision.

Individuals assess whether speaking up will be received constructively, whether it will create friction, and whether it carries personal risk. When the perceived cost outweighs the benefit, silence becomes the rational response.


This dynamic does not sit at the level of communication. It sits at the level of control.


An environment where concerns are not raised early is an environment where risk is allowed to accumulate without challenge.


Decision Drag and Loss of Control


One of the most visible manifestations of this dynamic is decision drag.

When ownership is unclear or accountability is diffused, decisions slow down or move across multiple layers before resolution. Coordination begins to replace action.


The impact is immediate. Execution loses pace. Alignment weakens. Risk exposure increases across functions.


Restoring control requires clarity in ownership, precision in decision rights, and consistency in how decisions are taken under pressure.


The Missing Layer Between Operations and Escalation


Most organisations are designed to respond to issues once they reach a certain threshold. Fewer are structured to act on the signals that appear before that point.


Between normal operations and formal escalation sits a critical layer where early indicators emerge. This is where behavioural signals, hesitation, and misalignment first become visible.


Strengthening this layer allows organisations to act earlier, reducing reliance on reactive processes such as investigations or formal interventions.


From Culture Narrative to Board-Level Evidence


Culture is frequently discussed at board level, yet often remains difficult to translate into decision-relevant insight.


Effective oversight requires a shift from narrative to evidence.


This includes identifying specific behavioural signals, tracking them consistently, and presenting them in a format that supports decision-making. Clarity of signal matters more than volume of information.


When culture is measured through its impact on decisions, escalation, and execution, it becomes a tangible input into governance rather than an abstract concept.


Final Reflection


Culture does not fail suddenly. It weakens through patterns that remain unchallenged.


The role of risk leadership is to recognise these patterns early, interpret them with precision, and act before they become visible as incidents.


Control is not lost at the point of failure. It is lost much earlier, when the signals were present and not acted upon.

 
 
bottom of page